Thinking about…

Pentecost.  Yes, this is an official church-nerd-out-of-control post.

Well, maybe not.  Maybe it is just me being sentimental.  You see, this Pentecost Sunday (May 27, 2012) will be the second anniversary of my licensing by the Calvary Baptist Church (you can read about it here).  That day was the beginning of many wonderful changes for me.  And as I embrace the remembrance of that first Pentecost again this year, I am about to step off on yet another adventurous  path along the way.  I have been accepted to the program in Christian Formation at the Virginia Theological Seminary in Alexandria, VA.

I have no idea where I am going, but I must say that I don’t seem to worry about it as much as I did.  That is probably because  I have such amazing role models and also because of the support of those around me, like my small group, and my friends, and the amazing people in our congregation.

I am blessed with so much.  I am so lucky.

On that day, two years ago, a most beloved person spoke these words to me as she hugged me after the laying on of hands that is a part of that blessing:  “Do you feel the weight of it all yet?”.  And the answer, dear friends, is yes.  I think I have always felt the weight of it.  The difference is that now, I feel that weight as yet another blessing; I understand just a little bit more about what that weight is calling me to do and who it is calling me to be.

So come this Pentecost, I’ll stand again and join with my community as we tell the story of the birth of the church. I may even sing a song or two.  And I will remember what has come before, both in my life and in the story of faith that preceeded me…and I will open my arms again to what is to come.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Why, and on whose authority?

If my mother were still with us and you could ask her, she would tell you that “Why?” and “Who says?” are two questions that I have asked since the moment I first understood how to ask a question.  I was one of those children, you know, the kind who drive all adults around them to total distraction with repeated questions about how the world works and why it works that way and who says it works that way.  Clearly, asking the big questions and living in a world of questions has been part of my spirit since, well, since forever.

So it is probably not surprising to anyone that one of the discussions that fascinated me the most at the “Singing in the Church” conference I attended was the discussion about this question:  on whose authority do we sing what we sing?

There is the related question of why we sing, but the past three years of my life have been devoted to that question and right now I’m a little more clear on the whys of singing in worship and the reasons that we worship together.  Dr. Thomas G. Long probably puts it most succinctly in his book Beyond the Worship Wars:  Building Vital and Faithful Worship, when he repeatedly defines worship as the act of coming together to make possible an experience of the Mystery.  The Mystery can mean many things to many people, but I think for most of us it means coming together and making space for God to show up in our lives, whatever that means to us, hopefully in a way that we can then carry with us into the more secular world of our daily living.   I believe that music plays a part in this act of worship, because music itself is still in so many ways a mystery to even the  most rational and empirical among us.  Singing for me is like a mystery invoking a Mystery.

That is, however, an ongoing discussion to continue in another moment.  Right now, back to this question…when we are planning worship, on whose authority do we decide what to sing?  We discussed this endlessly in Atlanta, in many contexts.  It remains a large and roughly unanswerable question, particularly in the free church tradition where there is no hierarchy dictating liturgical content and structure.  And it is a question that invites our human sense of control to step into the breach, something that is not always a good thing.

And so, it is up to each and every one of us who bear some small responsibility for corporate worship in any case to find our own heart in this matter.  As is so human, our conversations in Atlanta began with what does NOT constitute the authority on which we sing, and the pitfalls of discerning what music to offer:

  • We do not sing  based on the authority of the worship committee, its tastes and preferences.
  • We do not sing based on the authority of the music director, their tastes and preferences.
  • We do not sing based on the authority of the pastor, the trustees or any other part of our individual church governance structure, nor according to their tastes and preferences.
  • We do not sing simply what has always been sung (except in those rare cases where a community coalesces around a song for theological or faith reasons, and that song becomes a part of the community’s faith identity).
  • We do not program music just because we sang it in some other choir somewhere.
  • We do not offer music to entertain, or even to make comfortable (unless, of course, the point of the lesson for the day is healing and comfort).
  • We do not pick music because it is for us as professional musicians, interesting or challenging.
  • We do not even pick music because we ourselves find it particularly inspiring or moving.

Of course, again recognizing our humanity , we have all picked music for one of those reasons from time to time.  But it seems, once you view this list of pitfalls, it becomes clear that the two questions I posed at the beginning of this essay are not as inseparable as you might think:  why we sing is not really such a different question from what we sing.

Yes, I used the word “authority” when I originally asked this question — that is the framework in which it was discussed in Atlanta.  But for those of us in a free church tradition, “authority” is a much more difficult concept.  Cooper and McClure, in their book Claiming Theology in the Pulpit, suggest that as people of faith we formulate our beliefs based on our understanding of four types of authority:  the authority of Scripture, the authority of tradition, the authority of personal experience, and the authority of reason (pg. 19-31).  Their analysis holds true when applied to the question of what  do we sing in worship, just as it applies to any other aspect of the theology of our worship and liturgical planning.

But again, what do you do if you work and worship in a community that embraces diversity on every level possible and has no hierarchical structure dictating just what you offer in worship each week?  After all, design by committee is not feasible or particularly accurate, and you cannot really consult a lot of people each week when you are picking hymns.  What you can do, however, is be clear about the theological goal of the process.

And so, here is what I would do (mind you, I don’t select service music on a regular basis, with the exception of my own solo material when it is required):  I would develop a set of questions as my guide. Yes, you heard me, is any one really surprised that my answer would be a series of questions?  Some of the questions are basic:  how does this music fit with the Lectionary texts of the day, how does it work with the Pastor’s sermon, does it incorporate any of the special themes of the day, does it support the mood and tone the Pastor is trying to establish for the worship service.

But the most important question, and the one that in my observance is seldom asked is this:  does this particular choice of music extend the hand of hospitality to the congregation?  Yes, hospitality.  Does this musical choice invite everyone in the pews to take part?  Does it invite them to sing?  Does it invite them to worship?  Does it include as many people as possible?  If we recognize the humanity and the divinity of everyone in the worship space, does our musical choice encourage them to recognize their own nature and participate with the community in worship.

I often think that it is a shame that music directors spend so much time with their backs to the congregation.  Those of us who see the faces of our fellow worshippers know everything they think about every musical choice (yes,  some of us on the platform are paying attention).  We see the pocket of people in the stage left corner confused by the 6 stanza hymn because it is in a language other than their own native tongue.  We see the many people in the congregation who don’t even open the hymnal when it is time for a song.  We see those struggling to understand the page before them.  And we see how many of those people open up and sing when we ask them to sing something that inspires them or something that they know from long ago or something that we have taught them through repetition and use in the service, like this one .

We cannot offer a song that inspires everyone each and every time we sing.  We can make an effort to use a musical language that speaks in many idioms at different times.  And yes, we will probably fail many, many times.  But the moments when we succeed are so precious, because, then we have done our job:  we have made space for God to do the work that can only be done in that time and that place.

The answer to the questions posed as I started is:  there is no answer.  We will never understand the ultimate definition of authority.  Even as a community, the best we can do is guard against the development of an opinion that the music itself is the most important thing, more important than the participation of the people in the room in the worship experience.

For me, there are only questions that I can use to guide me, hopefully, towards the song that I am supposed to hear and to share. May I always remember to ask them.

 

Posted in General, Liturgy, Music | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Pink, and orange, and white, and red

Reader alert:  it is Spring, and therefore it is time for my annual garden analogy blog entry. I just can’t help myself.  But no kudzu this time, I promise.

Instead, this year, the topic is roses.  Somewhere, a long time ago, when we first moved into this house on Capitol Hill, I read an article that said planting roses in front of possible entries that might invite, shall we say, unwelcome visitors, was an excellent way to use landscaping to increase the security of your home.  And so I proceeded to plant climbing roses in front of the ground floor windows of each apartment.  In front of one house, I planted a beautiful white climber that has prospered and become a giant over the years of its life.  In front of the other, I planted some beautiful but less successful red rose trees that have proven ungainly and difficult to manage.    About three feet from the white roses, I also planted a bush of my mother’s favorite rose, the lovely orangey striped rose known as a Peace Rose.

For years, all of these flowering bushes and vines have coexisted, alternately producing luscious blossoms and testing my patience with bugs and fungus in the drier months, but each year they have returned and produced their own beautiful red, white, and orangey blossoms.

Until this year.

This year, when I looked over my floral bounty I saw something new:  amid the red roses of the rose trees, there were pink roses on the same stem.  And, in the midst of the copious white blooms,  there were Peace roses growing from the white rose vine.

At the age of 14, I received a lot of awards for my science project about plant propagation and grafting, including a trip to the city-wide science fair.  I learned all about propagating from cuttings and grafting, and actually grafted an apple to a pear tree successfully.  Obviously, this early success did not lead to a career in botany or the development by me of some new radical species of plant.  But it did leave me with enough information to cause me to be very curious when I saw the fruits of my rose garden in 2012.

Why did the white rose mix with the red rose and make pink?  Why did the Peace rose retain its nature and form but still choose to grow together with the white rose?  And what makes the white rose so frisky this year that it mixed with everything around it (perhaps this question is for another discussion).    And, being no botanist, but someone very interested in how people relate with one another in community, I couldn’t help but ask what does all this say about we humans as people in community.

Okay, yes, relationship and community are topics always on my mind.  These things are particularly on my mind as I visit and examine the possibilities for me at different academic institutions, and the meaning of those possibilities for the next stages of my life and my spiritual journey, and the meaning of these changes for the communities in which I exist.

My conclusion?  I think for most of my life I have been more like the red rose, blending into my nature the strong influence of the community in which I live and work.  But I think that right now, it is time to be more like the Peace rose, a clear expression of my unique self, but an integral part of the vine that brings me and my community life and growth.

I think it is going to be hard to be that Peace rose.  But I’m going to give it a try.

Posted in Faith, General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

One Body, One Song…

In March, I had a chance to attend a conference about singing in the church.  I wrote my personal impressions while I was still there, but now I’d like to talk about a few of the things I learned.  The following is not just for those who work as musicians in the church.   If you go to church, if you have ever gone to church, if you have ever faced a moment when you had to sing in a group and were uncomfortable, if anywhere in your life someone made you feel like you couldn’t take part in something just because you weren’t “trained”, please keep reading.  I think you will relate to some of the things I had a chance to learn…things I learned about the ways in which we as classical musicians let our assumptions about making music get in the way of being the kind of inclusive group that the music we make begs us to be.

One of the highlights of the conference was a Big Sing with John Bell .  A big sing is kind of like a hymn sing interspersed with sermon and commentary, not a concert, not a rehearsal, but, as we would have said back in the ’70′s — a happening.  He said many memorable things as always.  But this is the one that really stuck in my mind:

Personally, I consider music reading a kind of a fetish.  70% of the world just doesn’t do it.  But for those of you whose mothers slaved to give you music lessons, the song we are about to sing is on page 3 of the handout.

There was a lot of talk about world music and how music is made in cultures other than our own, Western European-based musical culture, especially in the break-out session with composer and musician Tony Alonso …a session where we talked specifically about having an inclusive music program in a church where different cultural groups worship together and separately.  We talked about the mistakes we make as classically trained musicians, and in general the mistakes we make (and how we fail at being inclusive) when we represent that larger or more dominant group in a congregation.

I am very ashamed to admit that, at my church, we make all these mistakes, despite our good intentions.  And that was the point of the seminar, after all — to give us a chance to see and understand the limitations in our perspective created by our training.  Because these mistaken assumptions on our part not only exclude people for whom Western musical tradition is not the primary tradition, they also exclude any one who does not already consider themselves a trained musician according to the standards of our culture.

Let’s take a moment and look at the kind of beliefs I’m talking about.

The first one relates directly to the quote from John Bell above.  As a classical musician, I am trained to believe that the musical score contains the composer’s intent and MUST be adhered to, if you are to bring music to life in the room.  But this is simply not the only truth of music and actually not the dominant truth of music.  Many other musical traditions prize improvisation;  if there is a score at all, it is a blue print not the final word.  And in even more musical traditions, in fact in most traditions, music is passed from person to person, from generation to generation, and is NEVER WRITTEN DOWN.  Music, in those cultures is personal, not intellectual. It seems obvious, but as a classically trained musician, I know that I often forget this reality.  In South Africa, a composer stands up to create…the music comes from the body and the soul, not through harmony and counterpoint and intellect to the page.  In many churches, we are bound by the hymnal in the pew — we do not deviate from it, we do not include other music…sometimes in our laziness we even use it for moments with the choir.  And yet, the first fully interlinear hymnal (a hymnal in which words and music were printed as we see them today, inserted beneath the line of music you sing,  and the music contained standard four-part harmonic notation) was only printed in 1956 — that’s right, 1956– the Baptist Hymnal of 1956.  See, it isn’t really so radical to print the text in the bulletin without the score and then teach the tune to the congregation.

Another mistake, or assumption, that we make as classically trained musicians is the belief that harmony and melody are the dominant features of music.  Again, this is not true in many cultures where rhythm dominates.  This leads into another assumption:  that vocal timbre should be pure and choral sound should be well-blended.  I’m not suggesting that we sing the Bach Mass in B minor in pure chest voice, but we should not carry our vocal assumptions to music from other cultures.  In many cultures, raspiness and distinctive sound are highly valued and considered moving.  If I’m singing Siyahamba, I’m not going to spare the chest voice and I’m not going to worry about the scoop to the high note.  Some people around me might be offended, but that is what I’m going to do because it is IN the music, if not on the page.

The next assumption is so rooted in the Western philosophical system that it almost made me laugh when I first heard it: we assume that the superior musical form is linear.  Let’s go back to the example of Siyahamba:  if you choose that item from your hymnal for inclusion in worship on a given Sunday, what is the first question you are likely to hear?  “How many times will we sing it?”  And, if you have people in your midst that don’t see the purpose of world music in worship, the next criticism or complaint you will hear is “but it is so repetitive”.   Again, in our culture, we prefer the linear; but in many places in this world, places where they also worship and sing, the cyclical form is superior to the linear.  The repetitive chorus that can be carried away in your heart and your soul can heal, it can cheer, it can work its simple magic in a way that a 6-stanza didactic hymn cannot.  A so-called repetitive song allows us to make what is new to us old and familiar because the repetition is immediate, so that singing “Come Bring Your Burdens to God” can quickly become as meaningful and familiar as singing an old, more complicated song, like “It is Well with My Soul”, a song worn into our being by years of repetition.

Finally, and maybe the biggest mistake on this list is the most exclusive of all:  the belief, in our culture, that the “musicians” are the ones with a particular talent and that they are better at it because they have training to use that talent.  This belief is an extension of the modern belief that there are “performers” and there are “listeners”; regrettably this model has extended to our churches and our worship services.  In so many cultures of this earth, the assumption is that EVERYONE SINGS; that singing is like breathing.    If a song starts up, everyone is invited; everyone belongs when the music plays, no one stands back and judges the quality of an individual’s contribution.

This is not the truth of my church, I am sorry to say.  I have watched for years now as the music program has failed to include more people; I have watched people come for a while and then leave; I have puzzled and wondered what to do to change this fact.  In our sadness, we say to ourselves that people just don’t want to make the committment. It is not that we have not tried, but we are always busy inviting people to join us in “our way” of making music.  And there lies the big mistake:  “our way”.

I personally (and my fellow section leaders) can be as humanly welcoming and encouraging as I can possibly be, but it will not change anything if the program is not itself welcoming and inclusive, if we don’t spend time listening and learning more about how others relate to music.

Don’t misunderstand:  I believe in excellence, I believe in providing beautiful, soul-filled music for public worship.  I believe in making music as an expression of my faith, using all my musical skills and training.  But I also believe that it is not enough to have a music program that satisfies the performers and those already dedicated to the belief that it is their job to listen while the professionals work.

In our programming and our daily working, in my musical church world, we are guilty of each and every one of these assumptions.  And, when we fail to move past these assumptions, we fail to use the power of music to convey its most powerful message:  that music is the very best language with which to convey the message and the meaning that we are all One Body in Christ.  When you sing something from another land, from another tradition, or when you fully sing anything, you have the opportunity to feel your participation in the Body of Christ at a wholly different level of comprehension, you physically feel part of the Body.

I am not suggesting that we start a praise band or that we even drastically change the format of what we do.  I am suggesting that we open our arms and our ears and invite the world in to teach us a few things…that we find ways to let everyone’s song be heard and experienced.  Our way is not the only way and it may not be the most worshipful way, at least not every single day.

As a music staff, we made beautiful and moving music during Holy Week.  I know that because I felt it, and because so many people who often have nothing to say about the music on a weekly basis went out of their way to tell me that the music was wonderful.   But it was all music that we made for others to listen to…oh yes, there were familiar hymns for all to sing, but we were definitely performers and listeners on that day.

As we move into the Easter season and walk towards Pentecost, I’m going to hold in my heart the hope that we can begin to figure out how to step away from these assumptions and  begin to offer something to those who simply want to make a joyful noise unto the Lord…because I love it when I hear the congregation sing.  It is a more beautiful sound that any person can ever make by themselves…that sound of hundreds with their voices lifted up in worship to God, in the full knowledge that they too are part of the One Body and the One Song.

 

Posted in General, Liturgy, Music | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

It is never about the high note…

Music is, in so many ways, all about the phrasing.  When you experience someone as a “very musical” performer, the technical musical thing that is happening is phrasing–phrasing that best showcases the emotion or meaning of the music being presented.  For the best musicians, phrasing becomes like breathing and requires little thought.  Most of the rest of us work at it most of the time.

But one of the most important things we learn, as we learn to phrase, is this rule:  the high note is hardly ever the point of the phrase.  This rule applies to singers and to instrumentalists;  the most important thing about a phrase is its destination…and it is usually not the highest or most exciting note.  Phrasing is a journey, a conversation, something organic.

So when I picked up my devotional book this morning (The Song Forever New:  Lent and Easter with Charles Wesley) I was excited to see that the readings continue through this week, a week referred to in the liturgical calendar as the octave of Easter (octave here referring to the 8 days after Resurrection; in music, referring to an interval  of a perfect 8 steps).  I couldn’t help draw the analogy with what I know musically:  the high note (Easter) is definitely not the destination of the phrase that we call the Gospel narrative.

Why ”the octave of Easter”?  Well, an 8-day feast of celebration has been common in liturgical practice since the earliest days of Judaism (Lev. 23:36); 8 was considered a sacred number, a number of completion.  There is an entire system of greater and lesser octaves in the liturgical calendar of the Catholic church.  This particular liturgical octave provides us with is the same as the gift of the liturgical calendar itself:  a framework for remembering and meditation, a framework to help us navigate our way from the high note (Easter) through the rest of the phrase (life). The octave of Easter let’s us take a breath (literally, for those of involved in leading worship during Holy Week) and remember the personal encounters of those who met the Risen Christ in those first chaotic days, and to think about the power of the Resurrection in our own lives and just how we can participate in and bear witness to its transformative power.  The greatest part of the phrase is yet to be sung, sung when we live into the promise of Easter.

And so, for the next eight days, we practice the discipline of remembrance once again. Paul Wesley Chilcote, the author of The Song Forever New, takes as his text for the day John 20:11-18…for today is the day that we remember the women who found the empty tomb and offers this hymn written by Charles Wesley (remember, a hymn is the text, not the song…but if you want to sing this after you read through it, the best tune is that used for  Come, Ye Thankful People, Come, a hymn tune known as St. George’s Windsor):

Happy Magdalene, to whom
Christ the Lord vouchsafed t’appear!
Newly risen from the tomb,
Would he first be seen by her?
Yes, to her the Master came,
First his welcome voice she hears:
Jesus calls her by her name,
He the weeping sinner cheers.

Highly favored soul! To her
Farther still his grace extends,
Raises the glad messenger,
Sends her to his drooping friends:
Tidings of their living Lord
First in her report they find:
She mus spread the gospel word,
Teach the teachers of mankind.

Who can now presume to fear?
Who despair his Lord to see?
Jesus, wilt thou not appear,
Show thyself alive to me?
Yes, my God, I dare not doubt,
Thou shalt all my sins remove;
Thou has cast a legion out,
Thow wilt perfect me in love.

Surely thou has called me now!
Now I hear the voice divine,
At they wounded feet I bow,
Wounded for whose sins but mine!
I have nailed him to the tree,
I have sent him to the grave:
But the Lord is risen for me.
Hold of him by faith I have.

Hear, dear followers of the Lord,
(Such he you vouchsafes to call)
O believe the gospel word,
Christ hath died and rose for all:
Turn you from your sins to God,
Haste to Galilee, and see
Him, who bought thee with his blood,
Him, who rose to live in thee.

May we, too, like the Magdalene and the women at the tomb, hear the call and believe.  Blessed Easter Monday to you all.

Posted in Books and Reading, Calling, General, Liturgy, Music | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The strangest story of all…

I will admit that when I began the committment to read from Orbis Books Bread and Wine (2003), I skipped ahead a bit and read all the poetry.  At the beginning of Lent, the poem I’ve quoted here really didn’t make much sense to me.  I’m not a person who is often moved by poetry (which you might find strange since I spend a good deal of my life singing various forms of poetry), but this morning in the early hours as I sat with me tea, relaxing that last few precious minutes before the rush of Easter Sunday was upon me, this poem meant a great deal to me.  I therefore, share it with you, and say to you, “Christ is Risen!”.  I can wait to hear the answer to that time worn greeting later today.

Seven Stanzas at Easter (John Updike)

Make no mistake:  if He rose at all
it was as His body;
if the cells’ dissolution did not reverse, the molecules
reknit, the amino acids rekindle,
the Church will fall.

It was not as the flowers,
each soft Spring recurrent;
it was not as His Spirit in the mouths and fuddled
eyes of the eleven apostles;
it was as His flesh:  ours.

The same hinged thumbs and toes,
the same valved heart
that–pierced–died, withered, paused, and then
regathered out of enduring Might
new strength to enclose.

Let us not mock God with metaphor,
analogy, sidestepping, transcendence;
making of the event a parable, a sign painted in the
faded credulity of the earlier ages:
let us walk through the door.

The stone is rolled back, not papier-mache,
not a stone in a story,
but the vast rock of matierality that in the slow
grinding of time will eclipse for each of us
the wide light of day.

And if we will have an angel at the tomb,
make it a real angel,
weighty with Max Planck’s quanta, vivid with hair,
opaque in the dawn light, robed in real linen
spun on a definite loom.

Let us not seek to make it less monstrous,
for our own convenience, our own sense of beauty,
lest, awaked in one unthinkable hour, we are
embarassed by the miracle,
and crushed by remonstrance. (pg. 261-262)

Blessed Easter to you all….

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Time to testify once more…

The last thing that I should be doing is sitting at the computer writing, but I have to eat my sandwich and drink my last cup of tea before tonight’s performance anyway, so here it goes.

I have written before that Lent as a season has been a very different experience for me than in past years.  And, as I approach our remembrance of Good Friday this difference continues.  For the five years before tonight, each Good Friday, we have offered a Good Friday concert…sacred music meant to guide worship or to simply inspire, depending on your beliefs.  Most of the pieces have been Baroque or Classical in compositional style, and tonight is no different.

What is different, then?  Tonight, for the first time, I am really clear on what I am doing.  The first year, it was a way to remember Good Friday, yes, but also an act of gratitude to my new friends at Calvary and my teacher who was no longer with me.  And over these past years, my own motivation and orientation has transformed from that of musician-who-is-moved-by-sacred-music to that of worshipper-who-speaks-through-the-language-of-music.

In short, tonight I know that I am here to testify.

If you join us tonight, listen for the story.  Listen for the faith of those declaiming that story.  Having met most of the musicians, I’m guessing you will hear it as much in the work of the organist as in the words of the singers.

Listen.  We are going to tell you a story, a very important one.  And we believe what we are saying.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

The Promise of the Passion

Yes, it is Holy Week.  Yes, it is a week of rehearsing and praying and worshipping and making a lot of music for me. And yes, since it is Holy Week, it is time for our 6th (can you believe it), Music for Good Friday program.  This year, we are performing Carl Heinrich Graun’s Der Tod Jesu (The Death of Jesus), premiered in 1755.  If you are interested, below are the program notes for this Friday’s performance.

The Music for Good Friday program, which has been so gratefully housed and supported by my beloved Calvary Baptist Church, has been a workshop for me in so many ways — a chance to learn and grow both theologically and musically.  Finally, this year, I must have been ready to confront ideas about atonement, so we are presenting a sung Passion Cantata.  It is a challenge both musically and spiritually, but I hope will be a meaningful experience for everyone in the room.

If you are in town, please come (the details are here).  If not, maybe after you read my notes below, you will listen to the music (which can be purchased on ITunes).  In either case, may you have a blessed Holy Week and may Easter come to your life again very, very soon.

About Tonight’s Program

The great Spanish mystic, St. John of the Cross, once wrote: “It is not the act of a good disciple to flee from the Cross in order to enjoy the sweetness of easy piety.” Tonight, we do not flee.

We’ve called our program The Promise of the Passion, because, if we are Christian, we gather tonight to remember Jesus at his most human, at that time in the liturgical calendar set aside to remember his physical death. We weep for his humanity and for our own, as we wonder what is next. But even in our sorrow and our fear, we know that there is a promise in his suffering, a promise of hope and light for us. And if we are not practicing Christians, we gather simply because we are human ourselves and experience in that humanness the same trials and challenges that are part of Jesus’ story on this day.

What Do We Mean by Passion?

The Passion is theological term used for the events and suffering – physical, spiritual, and mental – of Jesus in the hours before and including his trial and execution by crucifixion. The Crucifixion of Jesus is an event central to Christian beliefs.

The origin of the word is Greek, from the verb paschō, to suffer.  Those parts of the four Gospels that describe these events are known as the “Passion narratives”.  In the liturgical calendar, Holy Week, beginning on Palm Sunday and ending on Easter Saturday, commemorates the events of the Passion narrative.

Why Do We Sing the Passion Story

If we are lovers of classical vocal music, when we hear the word “Passion” in relationship to music, we first think of the Passion settings by J. S. Bach.  While his great works, the St. Matthew Passion and the Passion of St. John, may be the most often performed and the most familiar to us, they are just two works among a large liturgical genre that reached its zenith in the first half of the 18th century in Germany.

The reading of the Passion from one of the Gospels during Holy Week dates back at least to the 4th century. In the 5th century Pope Leo the ordered the gospel of Matthew to be read on Palm Sunday and the following Wednesday and that of John on Good Friday. The practice of singing the Passion began in the Middle Ages, possibly as early as the 8th century. By the 13th century different singers were used for different characters in the narrative.  The 15th century polyphonic settings began to add turba passages (turba, while literally meaning “crowd,” is used in this case to mean any passage in which more than one speaker speaks simultaneously).

In the later 15th century a number of new styles began to emerge, that led us to the type of Passion setting we will hear tonight:  the Summa Passionis, a poetic text that draws on the events of all four Gospel narratives.  Familiar works in this genre include The Seven Last Words of Christ by Franz Joseph Haydn and the version by Theodore Dubois, as well as The Crucifixion by John Stainer.

The work we hear tonight, like the Passions of J.S. Bach, is a creation of the Protestant Reformation in Germany.  Martin Luther believed that the suffering of Christ must be experienced by all who believe and not through words alone.  And so, the sung Passion, the Passion Cantata and the Passion Oratorio became important sacred music genres in the German states of the day.

Church Music in 18th Century Germany

In our present day, Passion music such as we hear tonight rarely appears in a liturgical setting.  Even if the performance we attend is set in a church, as it is tonight, we generally will experience this music in a concert setting.  But in the composer’s day, the crowds arriving at church to experience this music would come not just for the music but for the worship:  a Passion setting would be part of a larger service, often 4 or 5 hours long, including other music before or after, one or more sermons, and multiple prayers.  The music took the place of the readings – it told the story of Good Friday in the form of music.   The singing of the Passion would also be the first concerted music (music with instruments) that was offered in church during the entire season of Lent, a time of austerity and reflection, during which instrumental music was banned from service.

And, most likely, the performing forces would have been similar to what you see and hear tonight.  We know from the performing parts that remain to us from the 18th century that singing forces were organized in a similar fashion to that of the instrumental performers:  there were concerti singers (soloists, who sang all parts in the choruses and chorales as well) and ripieni singers (who were applied to specific movements to broaden the fullness and the impact of the sound). 

Carl Heinrich Graun (1703 or 1704-1759)

Carl Heinrich Graun was a very famous man in his day, even though he is virtually unknown to any but the most serious Baroque music specialist today. A contemporary Johann Adolf Hasse, George Phillip Telemann, and of J. S. Bach, he was well-known and celebrated composer of his time, and a tenor, Kapellmeister to the court of Frederick the Great of Prussia, and founder of the Italian Opera in Berlin. With all that accomplishment, even in his day, Graun was most famous for his religious music, and in particular, for the work that we perform this night, Der Tod Jesu (The Death of Jesus).

Der Tod Jesu (The Death of Jesus)

Tonight, the work we perform is made of music by Graun set to a text by the poet Carl Wilhem Ramler (1725-1798), a very popular devotional text, set to music by Graun, and Telemann  and J C F Bach (son of J.S.), among others.  Graun’s setting of Der Tod Jesu received its first performance on the Wednesday of Holy Week in 1755  in Berlin’s Domkirche (Cathedral), “in the presence of an uncommonly large crowd,” according to contemporary sources.  Telemann’s version premiered a week earlier in Hamburg.
Der Tod Jesu, often called a Passion Cantata (as compared to a Passion Oratorio such as those written by Bach and Telemann, that assign arias to specific characters in the drama) continued its popularity in Berlin through the 19th century, with its last Holy Week performance in 1894 before its revival as a concert work in the late 20th century. 

The text was published in 1760 as part of a trilogy:  Geistliche Kantaten:  Der Tod Jesus (1754), Die Hirten bei der Krippe Zu Bethlehem (1757) and Die Auferstehung und Himmelfart Jesu (1760)[i].  These libretti are the most frequently set texts for German cantatas and oratorios in the second half of the 18th century. Ramler’s text does not attempt to recount, step by step, the events of the narrative, but instead focuses on gift of redemption offered to Christians in the moment of sacrifice.  The result is a meditation on the Passion story, including familiar hymns, poetry and parallel Biblical texts designed to expand the listener’s experience of the event.

While the argument about whether or not the passions are “dramatic” works or not continues to rage in the musical world, we can see from the structure that Graun’s Der Tod Jesu is a purely sacred work.  No Evangelist, no direct representation of Jesus or Peter or any other character graces the pages.  In fact, you will hear the women sing some of the most famous of the seven last words of Christ.   

The structure is quite simple:  each recitative describes an important event in the story and the following aria comments on the event.  For example, in the recitative No. 6, “Ach, mein Immanuel”, the mezzo-soprano describes the events in the Garden of Gethsemane, when the Apostles sleep rather than watch as asked.  The last line is:  “O wake and pray, Brothers!”. The following aria, “Ein Gebet um neue Stärke”, comments on the importance of prayer.

The work also includes both Chorales (originally hymn tunes sung by the congregation) and choruses.  The chorales provide a moment of rest and reflection for the listener: familiar tunes, set with text that underscores the meaning of what they have just hear or are about to hear.  The chorale was a central feature of the Lutheran liturgy of the day. The choruses provide the commentary of the crowd (the turba) on the segment of the story in the following section.

As is often the case with Baroque music, our modern ears may experience this work as well, inappropriately cheerful for the subject matter. However, the tone is completely appropriate to the theological vision of the Enlightenment in which it was written.  Jesus was worshipped primarly as a hero (a theory of atonement that theologians label as “Christus Victor”, and the Passion story was set to music that reflected the great joy brought to humankind through the efforts of his suffering and death.

Tonight, we will be performing from the Carus Verlag edition 10.379, edited by Herbert Lölkes.

About the Concert Series

Calvary Presents… is a performance series created to showcase the work of local artists and arts organizations, residing at and supported by the ministry of the Calvary Baptist Church of Washington, D.C. For more information, visit our website, www.calvarydc.org.

Six Years Ago…

Six years ago, before I was a member of this community, when hardly anyone knew anything about me, the wonderful, loving and faith-filled members of this church welcomed my proposal for the first Music for Good Friday concert.  That night, we performed music by Pergolesi and Donizetti, and we remembered:  we remembered the events of Good Friday, and the man who brought music into my life again, my first teacher, Michael Patterson.

Six years later, we are here again, singing, playing and remembering, remembering the ever-present sacrifice of this day, remembering 150 years of worship and faith that have lived on this corner in Washington, DC; remembering that we are a community formed to live out the mission of the Gospel about which we sing, whatever that may mean.

I am most personally grateful for the chance to make wonderful, meaningful music here, with all that has meant to my own life and my own spiritual journey.  The fact that this program exists is a testament to the amazing openness and faith of this congregation, its inspiring pastor the Rev. Dr. Amy Butler, its lay leadership, the hard work of our Mission Board, our music staff and our guest performers, and most especially, our talented and energetic music director, Dr. Cheryl Branham. 

As performers, we feel blessed by the opportunity to speak through music, especially the opportunity to speak for those whose voices are muted and ignored.  We hope that if some part of this evening’s music moves or inspires you, you will consider helping these students who thirst for education, who thirst to honor the sacrifice about which we sing tonight.                                                                                              (Susan Sevier)



[i] Sacred Cantatas:  The Death of Jesus (1754), The Shepherds at the Cradle in Bethlehem (1757), and  The Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus (1760)

Posted in General | Leave a comment

That precocious child…

There is nothing to bring on a little journey of introspection like being trapped in the house while a new roof is installed, particularly if you live in a flat roof row house like ours (where the last four attempts at fixing the roof were installed one on top of the other).  Real work is pretty much impossible with the tap-tap-pound-pound-rip sounds that have been over my head all day.

But I did have a few minutes (between ka-thumps) to put a few pieces of a puzzle together, a puzzle that has been increasingly worrisome to me for the past couple of months.  Most of what I figured out I’ll keep to myself (or at least not put out here on the Internet), but the most intriguing thing that became crystal clear to me in my mental wanderings was this:  I’m still so very like I was when I was a child.

Not in every way, but in some interesting ways that I wouldn’t have expected.  The truly interesting characteristic that has remained, suprisingly, is what I might call my precocious nature…and what others might call my irritating penchant for projects, or even perhaps, my continual striving to know everything and experience everything.

Let me explain.  One of the many rituals of fall that I remember, every school year, was my mother’s pilgrimage to meet my teacher.  Now, I think most parents make an effort to meet their child’s teacher each year, but after I became an adult myself my mother shared with me her real purpose each year.  She went to these educational summit meetings with a message:  keep my daughter mentally and creatively stimulated, or beware.

It wasn’t that I would act out or disrupt class if I got bored, I was far too well-behaved for that.  But my mother was repeating a lesson that she had learned the hard way.  It seems, and I do remember this, that my third grade teacher, Mrs. Schalker (whom I adored), didn’t challenge me enough.  After about two months of school I was totally bored and I began the process of developing a mysterious fever right after lunch.  Two, sometimes three days a week, the ritual would be the same — I would develop a fever, I would go to the teacher who would then send me to the nurse, who would then call my mother and send me home.  This mysterious fever, I might add, was never identified by any doctor, and in most cases, disappeared magically by the time dinner rolled around.

All of my wonderful teachers after Mrs. Schalker got the “talk” at the beginning of the year, and did their best to keep me completely challenged…I was the queen of the special project.  My sixth grade teacher may have been the most creative — I remember delivering my first “extra credit” class paper on the process of making wine in France, complete with pencil sketches of the equipment needed and extensive maps of the regions that grew the best grapes.  My second project was my favorite — my first lecture on the evils of dialectical materialism, presented in front of a life-size diagram of Karl Marx that I had made with one of those old machines that allowed you to enlarge a small picture and trace it onto paper.

Needless to say, all of this was in the stone age, before computers.  I had to use pencils.

You may wonder why these stories are what came to me when I was waiting for the dust to clear from the roofing project.  But the reason is simple — I’ve begun to see that, well, I haven’t changed all that much.  I have probably found more acceptable ways to satisfy my performing self than boring my classmates with bad pencil drawings of a wine press, but I’m still always on the hunt for the next project, the next piece of interesting information that I can share, the next new thing that I can learn.  Yes, that’s me…synapses firing as fast as possible, filling my plate too full (both literally and figuratively) and doing the best I can to get the most out of every minute.

If I’m not doing that, I’m depressed and bored, and well, as my mother used to tell my teachers, I might just cause some trouble. I have a suspicion that those close to me know this secret already, even though I’ve never heard them say it.  But I’m really busy right now, so I guess we are all safe for the moment.

I think, eventually, we all really do have the desire to grow up.  And we may even think that will mean that we change.  But right now, I’m pretty happy to know that the inquisitive child who asked way too many questions and who needed a lot of stimulation and challenge still lives in my considerably older self.  I’m going to continue to need her over the next few years….

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Unfolding, defined…

Today, I’m branching out a little bit…I’ve had the opportunity to read Dr. David G. Benner’s book, Spirituality and the Awakening Self (2012) as a participant in the Patheos Book Club.  In return for receiving a copy of the book, I’ve agreed to share my impressions of the work and to let Patheos include a link to my thoughts.   To those who have not found my blog before, welcome.  And now, my humble thoughts on Dr. Benner’s latest volume.

For most of my life, I have struggled with the ideas of spiritual formation, change, transformation, awakening, and mysticism – I struggled with these concepts and their place in my life and  in any life lived in human society, long before I understood the words and their many and varied meanings, long before I understood their implications for my life and the lives of those around me.  I’ve bounced from the mystical life to the intellectual to the secular and back to the mystical again in my search, always dissatisfied…always looking for the via media, the middle way, the connection between the extremes, the place where we humans, even we consciously-questing humans, toil and fail and change and…well, I think you get the picture. 

One thing we all know:  change is hard.  It doesn’t matter what kind of change…learning to live without that afternoon cupcake, adding a morning walk to our routine, or learning to faithfully commit to a spiritual practice or a spiritual community…or all of the above.  Change is hard.  And, as Dr. Brenner points out, true transformation is even harder.

But not impossible. Not if you release the dichotomy between the secular and the sacred and embrace the whole…

Dr. Brenner never really says that, but that is my summary of his book:  To be a fully-integrated human being is to be a person who embraces the adaptations and changes that are life, the growth and cycles of body, mind and spirit.  A fully-integrated person welcomes the changing relationship among self (in both the psychological and the spiritual definitions of that word) and the world and the spirit.  Then, and only then, is lasting transformation possible.  And, only by embracing transformation can we truly give life to the journey that is before us (our return to God that is the human journey through incarnation).

Transformation is not simply change.  Nor is it reducible to maturation or self-improvement toward wholeness.  It is an unfolding of the self that moves us toward being at one within our self and with God.

Christians affirm that everything that exists is being held this very moment in Christ, and that everything that exists is being made new in Christ.  These mystical truths may be beyond our comprehension, but they are not beyond our potential experience. (xiv)

The point is to listen, because life gets in the way.  Listening can be supported by learning from the mystics.  No, not by going to live in a cave, but by incorporating the lessons of mysticism with the secular disciplines of psychology and philosophy and what they have to teach us about our own humanity.  This is the task Dr. Benner tackles in this book, and I believe he does a good job…combining his vast experience as a clinical psychologist with the experience of his own intense life of faith.  The book contains a variety of very engaging academic studies about faith practice and the relationship of spirituality to our more human parts. 

Yet, if we focus on transformation, unfolding, change…what about the ultimate goal of a life of faith?  What about being?  If we talk about the role of mysticism in transformation, what about the ultimate quest of the mystic — being one with the One?   A focus on transformation itself is, as is so typically Western European, a focus on movement instead of being.

I must confess, however, that I am most likely the wrong audience for this book.  While I agree with the premise, I am not a person to be approached through the left side of my brain, with facts and charts and studies.  But as I approach a more serious, academic study of spiritual formation and its dynamics myself, I do understand that this is useful and important information when you are offering spiritual direction and support to another who most likely will not have the same experience of the mystical that you, the director, might have.

I am always grateful for someone who can bring a level of verbal description to something that is for me completely experiential and instinctive.  But, my true evaluation of  a book when all is said and done is…did it inspire me and move me along my own journey of transformation?  I would have to say that Spirituality and the Awakining Self did not.  But even for the more mystical among us, it does provide some good tools and some well-crafted language we can use to speak to the rest of the world.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in General | Leave a comment